Two packers in light skin tone sit on a white table. They are both uncircumcised. A pink book sits in the background

Review: Axolom Fusion Uncut Packer

I reviewed the Thinker STP from Axolom—a relatively new STP and packer company—pretty recently, and was generally really impressed. While I had some concerns about how usable it was for play, I was generally really impressed! As well as one of their STPs, I also really wanted to try one of Axolom’s packers, and I asked if they could send me Fusion Uncut Soft FTM Packer. As with the Thinker STP, I was really excited to see another uncircumcised packer on the market, especially at the mid-range (and relatively low for silicone) of $59. This is a little more expensive than the New York Toy Collective Pierre—which is the cheapest uncircumcised silicone packer I know of—but not by a huge margin. And for that extra $4, the Fusion Uncut includes a feature that the Pierre doesn’t— a curved back, rather than a flat one.

I didn’t ask for or expect it, but Axolom also sent me the Fusion Mini Compact Packer, which is a smaller, flat backed, and slightly cheaper version of the Fusion Uncut. While I’m not going to focus on it too much, I will include a little section talking about it, comparing it to the Fusion Uncut.

The Axolom Fusion Uncut Soft Packer

As with Axolom’s other offerings, the Fusion Uncut comes in 7 skin tone options, without any current options for non-skin tone shades. I don’t find it to be noticeably large or small, although do bear in mind I am slightly taller than the average transmasc person, fat, and also tend to pack on the larger size. The shaft length is around 9.5 cm, although the balls and backing do make it quite chunky. There’s plenty of wrinkle detail, especially on the foreskin, which appears to be bunched up a little—I really like this as I feel it adds a bit of personality! And—as with the Thinker STP—the silicone is super soft. I kept finding myself petting the Fusion when it was out on my desk during the writing of this review, because it’s just super nice to touch! The shaft curves downwards in a natural way, and I don’t find the need to move it into particular positions or placement.

Wearing the Fusion Uncut Packer

I’m the type of trans guy who has far too many packers. While I enjoy reviewing new ones and I try to cycle through the many that I own, I do sometimes wonder if—were I not making an effort to use all my packers—some of them would end up gathering dust in the drawer I keep them in. I did wonder if the Fusion Uncut would also meet this fate, especially as my go-to packer choices were very settled on the Lennex and Mr. Right. As it turns out, the Fusion Uncut has replaced the Mr. Right as my go-to non-fantasy packer. This is for a couple of reasons, although the one I want to talk about most is the curved back.

I will admit that in the past I have sort of dismissed curved back packers. This is mostly due to how I’ve generally worn packers—for years, I’ve used a packing jock to hold them in place and then worn underwear on top. Both of the packing jocks I’ve tended to wear—from the SpareParts Pete and CalExotics Packer Gear lines—have always had a layer of fabric between my skin and the packer, so a curved back has always felt a bit unnecessary. I’m not exactly going to feel the difference, you know? However, I’ve recently changed how I pack. I gained some weight, and had to buy new packing underwear anyway. Because I work from home in my day job and only tend to pack if I go outside, I figured getting some packing boxers might actually be a reasonable decision now in a way it hasn’t been in the past, given I’ll only need a handful of pairs.

For me that’s been Cake Bandit (partly because they’re one of the few places that make packing underwear for plus sized transmascs, but that’s a conversation for another time), which have a little pouch for the packer shaft, and then hold the balls against the wearer’s body. And with them, I really feel the difference between flat back and curved backs. I still can happily wear both, but the curved back of the Fusion Uncut feels much more natural in how it connects with my body. Between having just a pair of boxers rather than a series of straps, and having a curved back to my packer? I sometimes totally forget that I am packing—it just feels like an extension of my body. Also, on a less wholesome note, that little ridge up the middle? Absolutely fantastic for getting handsy with— I feel a grope through the Fusion Uncut more than I do with other packers.

This isn’t the only reason I like the Fusion! I like the way the shaft falls, and I like that the tab at the top can be used to help adhere it to the body if somebody didn’t want to use packing underwear (although thick pubic hair might make that more challenging). I also really like the shape of the scrotum, and while the uncircumcised head is something I’m neutral about personally, I’m really glad it’s an option!

That said, the shaft doesn’t bend too much, so if you’re a ‘packing up’ person or want to dramatically pack to the side, I do worry about silicone tearing. Additionally, while this is the right size for me, I do think it might end up looking a little big on smaller and/or skinnier bodies. Something that might be a better option in those cases is the Fusion Mini Compact.

The Fusion Mini Compact Packer

The Fusion Mini Compact Packer is functionally just a smaller version of the Fusion Uncut. I won’t go into too much detail, as I both didn’t expect to review it and don’t have a huge amount to say. Aside from the size (the Fusion Mini has a shaft length of 8.9 cm) there are a couple of other differences. The Fusion Mini feels a bit softer and more compact, and it has a flat base, meaning the ‘feeling like an extension of the body’ element isn’t there. I personally am not huge on the Fusion Mini—I really like the curved back, and while I appreciate a small packer in some circumstances (like the gym), they generally do look and feel a bit too small on my frame. That said, if you’re less fussed about the curved back and are short or thin, the Fusion Mini might be a better option for you than the Fusion Uncut, as it still has the benefit of natural feeling shaft placement and lots of nice detail.

Overall

I am a curved back convert! I also am generally really impressed overall with the Fusion Uncut Soft FTM Packer. I do wish that the curved back continued into the Fusion Mini Compact Packer and that there were multiple sizes of packers, just because I am aware I do not have an average transmasculine build. However, aside from that I have no complaints at all! As with the Thinker, I’m really impressed, especially given Axolom is releasing the Fusion Uncut at a very reasonable $59.


This product was sent to me by Axolom, in return for a fair and impartial review. No affiliate links were used in this post.